Rijal Al Kashi Report 176 [extra Quality] -

In the vast ocean of Islamic biographical evaluation ( ‘Ilm al-Rijal ), few texts carry the weight and mystery of Rijal al-Kashi (formally known as Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifat al-Rijal ). Authored by Abu ‘Amr Muhammad ibn ‘Umar al-Kashi (d. 340-345 AH) and later abridged by Shaykh al-Tusi (d. 460 AH), this work is the cornerstone of Imamiya rijal literature. Within its pages lies a cryptic yet fascinating entry known to scholars as .

Among the hundreds of individual entries and historical reports preserved in this compendium, stands out as a highly significant narrative. It provides critical insights into the internal dynamics, theological boundaries, and political pressures facing the early Shia community during the lifetimes of the Imams. Contextualizing Rijal al-Kashi Rijal Al Kashi Report 176

Scholars evaluate the trustworthiness of the intermediaries who transmitted Report 176 to Al-Kashi, weighing whether the text itself was compromised by extremist infiltration. In the vast ocean of Islamic biographical evaluation

The text clarifies that the Imams viewed themselves as obedient servants of God, rejecting any claims of divinity, independent cosmic control ( tafwid ), or continuous new prophecy. 460 AH), this work is the cornerstone of

: This report is part of the broader field of Ilm al-Rijal (Biographical Evaluation), used to assess the reliability of hadith narrators like Uqba bin Bashir. Rijal Al-Kashi - General Islamic Discussion - ShiaChat.com

Recommendations

Hasan ibn Faddal—a contemporary—refuses to narrate from Yunus because Yunus allegedly transmitted from “untrustworthy individuals.” This suggests that while Yunus himself might have been upright, his sources were corrupted. In hadith methodology, this is called tadlis (concealing weak links).